Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / phenix-booking-ui

phenix-booking-ui

ASP.NET MVC site for post-booking activities on a Phenix booking (summary, audit, documents, admin, itinerary, myTC tabs), partially migrated out of Phenix Retail.

54 · amberhighkernelOn-premZDD: a long roadweb-ui

Health score

54

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
0
.NET Framework, out of mainstream support
Legacy transport / 15
6
Calls at least one legacy WCF endpoint
Test posture / 15
8
Some tests, coverage is thin
Security hygiene / 15
15
No credentials found in source
Dangerous coupling / 15
11
depends on pinning component(s): phenix-feature-service
Activity / 10
10
Actively maintained
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 542026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 54
No change since 2026-07-24 (54 to 54).

Facts

Languagescsharp, javascript, typescript
FrameworksASP.NET MVC 5, MediatR, SimpleInjector, Gulp 4
Runtimes.NET Framework 4.7.2
Tests / CIsome / CI in place
Last commit2026-07-24
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainBookings and fulfilment (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaPhenix
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "\ops\phenixbooking\phenix-booking-ui CI": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\ops\phenixbooking\phenix-booking-ui CI": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\ops\phenixbooking\phenix-booking-ui CI": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\ops\phenixbooking\phenix-booking-ui CI": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\ops\phenixbooking\phenix-booking-ui CI": DR: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases1 release pipeline(s): \ops\phenixbooking\phenix-booking-ui CI
Integrationrest, wcf
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

kernel Bound into the core by 2 mechanism(s).

Detaches when its pinning dependencies are cut or multi-targeted (phenix-feature-service); and when its WCF surface gains a modern interface or its WCF calls move to one.

Depends on / used by

Used by (0)
No internal dependents.

Data stores
redis:phenix-cache

Migration playbooks

Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

ZDD adoption

A long road

Technically eligible one day, but the blockers are structural: hosted WCF or SOAP contracts that cannot run two versions at once, or heavy legacy coupling. Sequence the modernisation work first. Legacy web front end: session state and framework age make mixed-version fleets risky until state is externalised.

Dependencies and gotchas
  • Consumes WCF contract packages: never take a breaking client bump mid-feature, and treat obsolete warnings as migration debt
  • Feature flags come from phenix-feature-service (WCF-only): flag reads themselves are a legacy dependency to watch
Steps
  1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
  2. Raise automated test coverage first: ZDD trades the end-of-sprint manual gate for continuous automated confidence, so the tests are the entry ticket.
  3. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
  4. Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
  5. Externalise any remaining session state so users can move between nodes mid-session without disruption.
  6. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
  7. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
  8. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

SQL Server exit

Not applicable

No SQL Server dependency is recorded for this repo. Nothing to migrate.

Containerisation

Feasible after replatforming

Appropriate, but the .NET Framework runtime has to go first; container work rides along with the replatform rather than preceding it.

Blockers
  • .NET Framework only runs on Windows; practical (Linux) containers need modern .NET
Steps
  1. Replatform to modern .NET first (see the recommended actions). Containerising then becomes routine.
  2. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
  3. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
  4. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
  5. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

Recommended actions

Replatform phenix-booking-ui to modern .NET

Runs on .NET Framework 4.7.2, out of mainstream support. Blocked until stage 2 cuts: phenix-feature-service.

Impact: Reduces the end-of-life runtime count

proposed

Assessment notes

phenix-booking-ui

Purpose

Phenix Booking is the post-booking UI for a Phenix booking. It implements the Summary, new Booking detail, Audit, Documents, Admin, Itinerary and myTC tabs; other booking tabs (legacy booking, notes, payments, customer, commission, etc.) still route to Phenix Retail or other Phenix apps because the migration out of Retail was never completed.

Tech stack

C# on .NET Framework 4.7.2 (csproj; README states 4.6.2 dev pack), ASP.NET MVC 5, SimpleInjector DI, MediatR, packages.config-style NuGet. Frontend assets built with Gulp/Sass plus TypeScript, using internal @tc/phenixstyles, @tc/web-styles, @tc/web-icons npm packages. AWS Cognito auth client, TC.ConnectionBroker suite (Sql, Redis, Wcf, Aws), extensive TC.Cache stack with Redis storage.

Deployment

Two release pipelines under \ops\phenixbooking\ (CI and stealth) from build pipelines phenix-booking-ui CI and phenix-booking-ui release; release_count 2. No pipeline YAML in the repo, so builds are classic/designer pipelines. Runs under IIS as part of the wider Phenix site, not standalone.

Dependencies

Internal: routes users to phenix-retail for unmigrated tabs and consumes the Phenix feature service for feature flags; also calls many Phenix backend services (booking, mail, documentation, contact-centre, credit-check, teams, suppliers) via TC.* service-client NuGet packages. External: AWS Cognito for authentication.

Data stores

No owned database. Redis is used as the cache storage (CacheStorage=redis in Web.config) via the shared Phenix cache infrastructure.

Integration points

Server-rendered MVC UI; outbound REST calls to Phenix APIs via ConnectionBroker HTTP clients and legacy WCF via TC.ConnectionBroker.Wcf.

Code health

MSTest unit test project and NUnit integration test project exist. Actively developed (last commit 2026-07-24) with a well-maintained README. Legacy csproj format with packages.config and hint-path references.

Modernisation risks

High: .NET Framework 4.7.2 ASP.NET MVC app tied to IIS with no path to .NET 8 without a rewrite; the Retail-to-Booking migration is half-finished so booking functionality is split across repos; classic (non-YAML) build pipelines; large legacy NuGet dependency graph.