Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / phenix-dashboard-api

phenix-dashboard-api

.NET 8 REST API for the Phenix homepage dashboard, serving denormalised dashboard data from MongoDB and keeping it fresh by consuming estate events off Redis Streams.

96 · greenlowloosely attachedOn-premZDD: no excuseapi

Health score

96

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
25
Runs on supported modern .NET
Legacy transport / 15
15
No legacy WCF or SOAP surface
Test posture / 15
15
Good test coverage
Security hygiene / 15
15
No credentials found in source
Dangerous coupling / 15
11
depends on pinning component(s): phenix-feature-service
Activity / 10
10
Actively maintained
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 962026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 96
No change since 2026-07-24 (96 to 96).

Facts

Languagescsharp
FrameworksASP.NET Core 8, Mediator (source-generated)
Runtimes.NET 8
Tests / CIgood / CI in place
Last commit2026-07-01
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainAgent tools and community (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaPhenix
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "\ops\dashboard\phenix-dashboard-api CI": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\ops\dashboard\phenix-dashboard-api CI": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\ops\dashboard\phenix-dashboard-api CI": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\ops\dashboard\phenix-dashboard-api CI": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\ops\dashboard\phenix-dashboard-api CI": DR: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases2 release pipeline(s): \ops\dashboard\phenix-dashboard-api CI; \ops\dashboard\phenix-dashboard-api stealth
Integrationrest, redis-streams
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

loosely attached Bound into the core by 1 mechanism(s).

Detaches when its pinning dependencies are cut or multi-targeted (phenix-feature-service).

Migration playbooks

Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

ZDD adoption

No excuse

Nothing technical is holding this repo on the three-week release. It either already deploys without downtime (AWS) or is a modern, well-tested service the automated stealth path can carry today. Modern runtime, good tests, no hosted legacy transport: the automated stealth path can carry it today.

Dependencies and gotchas
  • 1 system(s) depend on this repo; during a rolling deploy they will talk to old and new versions at once, so responses must stay compatible
  • Serialized state or messages in flight (Redis or queues): new code must deserialize objects written by the previous version
  • Feature flags come from phenix-feature-service (WCF-only): flag reads themselves are a legacy dependency to watch
Steps
  1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
  2. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
  3. Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
  4. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
  5. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
  6. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

SQL Server exit

Feasible now (1 owned database)

The database is solely owned by this system, so the migration is self-contained. Recommended target: PostgreSQL.

Steps
  1. Inventory the schema and query surface of sqlserver:OperationalDataStore: tables, stored procedures, triggers, cross-database joins and anything else engine-specific.
  2. Confirm the target: PostgreSQL (relational model; keep transactions and joins, swap the engine).
  3. Data access is not through an ORM, so port the SQL by hand: translate T-SQL constructs, replace stored procedures with application code or target-native equivalents, and add integration tests around the queries that matter first.
  4. Stand up the target alongside SQL Server, backfill with an ETL pass (pgloader or an export/import job), then dual-write or replicate until parity is proven.
  5. Move reads to the target, watch correctness and latency, then cut writes over and keep SQL Server read-only until confidence is earned.
  6. Decommission the SQL Server database and remove the connection strings and firewall paths that pointed at it.

Containerisation

Ready to containerise

Modern runtime, no hosted legacy transport: this service can follow the estate's proven container path (Dockerfile, shared pipeline template, ECS via Terraform).

Steps
  1. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
  2. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
  3. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
  4. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

Recommended actions

No specific actions for this repo. It either needs only normal maintenance, or its work is covered by an estate-level action. See the full programme.

Assessment notes

phenix-dashboard-api

Purpose

REST Web API for the main Phenix homepage dashboard. Read/Write/Admin controllers serve per-user dashboard state from a MongoDB store; a hosted Events.Processor consumes accounts, Trainline, Vibe and flights events from Redis Streams and a DataDenormaliser rebuilds dashboard projections, pulling source data from the OperationalDataStore SQL database.

Tech stack

Modern C# on .NET 8: source-generated Mediator and ServiceScan, API versioning, Swashbuckle, PhenixAuth AspNetCore authentication scheme, MongoDB.Driver with TC.ScriptRunner.Mongo migrations, TC.Streams with the Redis provider, CommunityToolkit.HighPerformance, health checks (including a Redis Streams check), and a BenchmarkDotNet memory-benchmark project.

Deployment

prod_application with 2 releases. Build pipeline phenix-dashboard-api CI from the in-repo build.yml (shared build-dotnet.yml template); release pipelines \ops\dashboard\phenix-dashboard-api CI and stealth. Eight per-environment appsettings.*.json plus web.config transforms; New Relic config checked in.

Dependencies

Internal packages: TC.ConnectionBroker.* (tc-connectionbroker), TC.Exceptions.WebApiClient (tc-exceptions), TC.Phenix.CompanyInfo (company-info-api), TC.Phenix.Feature (phenix-feature-service), plus event contracts consumed off streams: TC.Phenix.Accounts.Events (backoffice accounts domain), TC.Phenix.Trainline.Events (trainline-api), TC.Vibe.Events (vibe-api) and TC.Flights.WebAPI.Contract (phenix-flights). External: New Relic APM.

Data stores

MongoDB Dashboard database (dashboard read models, Mongo script-runner migrations); Redis Streams (Streams target) as the event source; read-only SQL access to the shared OperationalDataStore during denormalisation.

Integration points

Inbound REST (versioned, Swagger). Asynchronous consumption of estate events over Redis Streams; no message bus or WCF anywhere in the repo.

Code health

Good: API tests with faked-externals fixtures, data-layer tests and a dedicated events-processor test project, plus benchmarks. Actively maintained (last commit 2026-07-01). README is boilerplate apart from its one-line intro.

Modernisation risks

Low. Already on .NET 8 with tests and YAML CI. Residual concerns are its read dependency on the shared OperationalDataStore SQL database (coupling to whatever populates it) and dashboard correctness depending on multiple upstream event contracts — schema drift in those events is the likeliest breakage vector.