Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host

phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host

IIS-hosted WCF service implementing the passenger configuration contract with hardcoded company-GUID rules for whether full payment or an emergency contact is required.

40 · redmediumkernelOn-premZDD: a long roadservicedormant

Health score

40

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
0
.NET Framework, out of mainstream support
Legacy transport / 15
2
Hosts WCF or SOAP endpoints with no successor on modern .NET
Test posture / 15
8
Some tests, coverage is thin
Security hygiene / 15
15
No credentials found in source
Dangerous coupling / 15
11
depends on pinning component(s): phenix-passenger-configuration-service-contract
Activity / 10
0
Dormant: no meaningful change for two years or more while still deployed
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 402026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 40
No change since 2026-07-24 (40 to 40).

Facts

Languagescsharp
FrameworksWCF
Runtimes.NET Framework 4.6.2
Tests / CIsome / CI in place
Last commit2019-07-15
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainSelling and quoting (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaPhenix
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host develop": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host release": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host release": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host release": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host release": DR: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases2 release pipeline(s): phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host develop; phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host release
Integrationwcf
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

kernel Bound into the core by 2 mechanism(s).

Detaches when its pinning dependencies are cut or multi-targeted (phenix-passenger-configuration-service-contract); and when its WCF surface gains a modern interface or its WCF calls move to one.

Depends on / used by

Used by (0)
No internal dependents.

Capability duplication

Part of the Feature flags family (review): Hardcoded toggle maps

Migration playbooks

Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

ZDD adoption

A long road

Technically eligible one day, but the blockers are structural: hosted WCF or SOAP contracts that cannot run two versions at once, or heavy legacy coupling. Sequence the modernisation work first. Hosts WCF or SOAP endpoints: strict serialization contracts cannot safely run two versions at once (the shared-enum trap). End-of-life runtime compounds the work.

Steps
  1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
  2. Raise automated test coverage first: ZDD trades the end-of-sprint manual gate for continuous automated confidence, so the tests are the entry ticket.
  3. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
  4. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
  5. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
  6. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

SQL Server exit

Not applicable

No SQL Server dependency is recorded for this repo. Nothing to migrate.

Containerisation

Feasible after replatforming

Appropriate eventually, but not from here: the legacy runtime and the hosted WCF surface both have to go first, and that work is already in this repo's recommended actions.

Blockers
Steps
  1. Replatform to modern .NET first (see the recommended actions), replacing the hosted WCF/SOAP surface with REST, gRPC or messaging so consumers can follow. Containerising then becomes routine.
  2. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
  3. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
  4. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
  5. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

Recommended actions

Replatform phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host to modern .NET

Runs on .NET Framework 4.6.2, out of mainstream support. Blocked until stage 2 cuts: phenix-passenger-configuration-service-contract.

Impact: Reduces the end-of-life runtime count

proposed

Assessment notes

phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host

Purpose

The host half of the passenger configuration WCF service. A single .svc class implements IPassengerConfigurationServiceContract: IsFullPaymentRequired returns true only for the TC Limited company GUID, and IsPhenixBookingEmergencyContactRequired returns true for the TC Netherlands and TC Belgium GUIDs. Five company GUIDs (UK, NL, BE, CA, AU) are hardcoded as static properties — there is no data store, configuration, or admin surface; changing a rule means a code change and release.

Tech stack

C# .NET Framework 4.6.2, classic (non-SDK) csproj with packages.config, WCF .svc hosting under IIS. The only package reference is the contract NuGet TC.Phenix.Passenger.Configuration.ServiceContract 1.0.0. XDT Web.config transforms for production and training set the New Relic app name.

Deployment

Included with 2 releases. Classic build pipelines phenix-passenger-configuration-service-host develop and release with same-named release pipelines — no YAML in the repo. Runs as part of the Phenix Services IIS estate (New Relic app "Passenger Configuration Service, Phenix Services").

Dependencies

Internal: phenix-passenger-configuration-service-contract (the WCF interface package). External: New Relic APM only.

Data stores

None — all behaviour is hardcoded in the service class.

Integration points

Inbound WCF (basicHttp via IIS .svc endpoint). No outbound calls.

Code health

One MSTest test file covering the two methods — proportionate to the code, which is a handful of GUID comparisons. No README. Dormant since 2019-07-15. Classic csproj/packages.config format.

Modernisation risks

A whole IIS-hosted WCF service (plus a contract package and four pipelines across the two repos) exists to answer two boolean questions from hardcoded GUIDs. It is unsupportable from modern .NET clients without WCF tooling. The pragmatic fix is to move these flags into an existing company-configuration or feature service and retire both repos; the hardcoded company list is also a silent risk if new companies are onboarded. Medium priority — trivial size, but pure legacy.