Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / asset-management

asset-management

REST API for managing shared digital assets (images, videos, documents), handling upload, query and hosting via Azure Blob Storage and AWS S3, originally wrapping the MediaValet DAM provider.

85 · greenlowlooseOn-premZDD: no excuseapisecrets in source

Health score

85

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
25
Runs on supported modern .NET
Legacy transport / 15
15
No legacy WCF or SOAP surface
Test posture / 15
15
Good test coverage
Security hygiene / 15
0
Credentials or keys committed to source
Dangerous coupling / 15
15
No dangerous coupling detected
Activity / 10
10
Actively maintained
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 852026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 85
No change since 2026-07-24 (85 to 85).

Facts

Languagescsharp, sql
FrameworksASP.NET Core 8, Entity Framework Core 8, Swashbuckle 6.5
Runtimes.NET 8
Tests / CIgood / CI in place
Last commit2026-07-22
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainContent and destinations (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaShared platform
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "\marketing\asset-management": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\asset-management": Database (Development): deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\asset-management": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\asset-management": Database (Staging): deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\asset-management": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases1 release pipeline(s): \marketing\asset-management
Integrationrest
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

loose No binding mechanisms apply: this system needs no untangling work.

    Depends on / used by

    Used by (0)
    No internal dependents.

    Data stores
    sqlserver:AssetManagementazureblob:tcwebcontents3:Public_BlogVideos

    Migration playbooks

    Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

    ZDD adoption

    No excuse

    Nothing technical is holding this repo on the three-week release. It either already deploys without downtime (AWS) or is a modern, well-tested service the automated stealth path can carry today. Modern runtime, good tests, no hosted legacy transport: the automated stealth path can carry it today.

    Steps
    1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
    2. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
    3. Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
    4. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
    5. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
    6. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

    SQL Server exit

    Feasible now (1 owned database)

    The database is solely owned by this system, so the migration is self-contained. Recommended target: PostgreSQL.

    Steps
    1. Inventory the schema and query surface of sqlserver:AssetManagement: tables, stored procedures, triggers, cross-database joins and anything else engine-specific.
    2. Confirm the target: PostgreSQL (relational model; keep transactions and joins, swap the engine).
    3. The repo already uses Entity Framework: swap the provider (Npgsql for PostgreSQL) behind the existing model, then burn down the provider-specific differences the test suite finds.
    4. Stand up the target alongside SQL Server, backfill with an ETL pass (pgloader or an export/import job), then dual-write or replicate until parity is proven.
    5. Move reads to the target, watch correctness and latency, then cut writes over and keep SQL Server read-only until confidence is earned.
    6. Decommission the SQL Server database and remove the connection strings and firewall paths that pointed at it.

    Containerisation

    Ready to containerise

    Modern runtime, no hosted legacy transport: this service can follow the estate's proven container path (Dockerfile, shared pipeline template, ECS via Terraform).

    Steps
    1. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
    2. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
    3. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
    4. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

    Recommended actions

    Rotate the credentials committed to asset-management

    Risk flags indicate credentials or keys in source (secrets-in-source). Rotate now and enable secret scanning in CI; this is independent of all other work.

    Impact: Closes a live security exposure at near-zero cost

    proposed

    Assessment notes

    asset-management

    Purpose

    Digital Asset Management API: uploads, queries, moves and deletes shared assets (header images, videos, documents), generating upload URLs and hosting content on Azure Blob Storage / AWS S3 with Azure Media Services video transforms. Per the README it wraps the MediaValet DAM provider's API, though MediaValet references in code are now minimal.

    Tech stack

    .NET 8 ASP.NET Core Web API with a CQRS-style layout (Command/Query projects), EF Core 8 DAL (AssetManagementContext), Swashbuckle/OpenAPI, API versioning, StyleCop/rulesets, and health checks. AWS SDK (S3) and Azure Storage Blobs clients; connections resolved via TC.ConnectionBroker.

    Deployment

    Included prod application with 1 release: build pipeline asset-management, release pipeline \marketing\asset-management. YAML CI (azure-pipelines.yml) uses shared azure-pipelines-templates with .NET 8 SDK. Database deploys use DB Deploy-style sequential Change scripts in db/AssetManagementDatabase.

    Dependencies

    Internal: tc-connectionbroker (TC.ConnectionBroker.* packages), tc-exceptions (TC.Exceptions.*); also TC.Common.Hypermedia and TC.Diagnostics health-check packages. External: MediaValet DAM, Azure Blob Storage, Azure Media Services, AWS S3.

    Data stores

    sqlserver:AssetManagement (EF Core context plus dbdeploy change scripts), Azure Blob Storage account tcwebcontent* for hosted content, and AWS S3 bucket target Public_BlogVideos via ConnectionBroker.

    Integration points

    Exposes a versioned REST API with Swagger; calls Azure ARM/Media Services and blob/S3 APIs outbound. No message bus usage found.

    Code health

    Good test presence: five test projects including SpecFlow/NUnit API integration tests and unit tests per layer. Actively maintained (last commit 2026-07-22). README documents build/test/DB workflow.

    Modernisation risks

    Modern runtime, so low priority. Notable issues: Azure storage keys, client secrets and tenant IDs committed in appsettings.json (one secret annotated as expiring 2025) — should move to secret storage; legacy Microsoft.Azure.Storage.Blob 11.x coexists with the newer Azure.Storage.Blobs SDK; Azure Media Services was retired by Microsoft, so the video transform path needs replacing.