Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / backoffice-automatch-api

backoffice-automatch-api

API that lets Proservartner/Traverse bots raise or resolve supplier-confirmation queries against Phenix booking components, marking up costs and dispatching confirmation documents when details match.

79 · greenlowkernelOn-premZDD: ready with guardrailsapi

Health score

79

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
25
Runs on supported modern .NET
Legacy transport / 15
6
Calls at least one legacy WCF endpoint
Test posture / 15
8
Some tests, coverage is thin
Security hygiene / 15
15
No credentials found in source
Dangerous coupling / 15
11
depends on pinning component(s): mailtemplate-service
Activity / 10
10
Actively maintained
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 792026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 79
No change since 2026-07-24 (79 to 79).

Facts

Languagescsharp, sql
FrameworksASP.NET Core 8
Runtimes.NET 8
Tests / CIsome / CI in place
Last commit2026-05-01
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainPayments and finance (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaPhenix
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "backoffice-automatch-api": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "backoffice-automatch-api": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "backoffice-automatch-api": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "backoffice-automatch-api": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "backoffice-automatch-api": DR: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases2 release pipeline(s): backoffice-automatch-api; backoffice-automatch-api - Stealth
Integrationrest, wcf
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

kernel Bound into the core by 2 mechanism(s).

Detaches when its pinning dependencies are cut or multi-targeted (mailtemplate-service); and when its WCF surface gains a modern interface or its WCF calls move to one.

Migration playbooks

Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

ZDD adoption

Ready with guardrails

Close: the deployment path exists, but specific checks are needed first, typically raising tests, auditing serialized data, or respecting a shared schema with expand and contract. Test coverage is thin; ZDD shifts the safety net onto automation.

Dependencies and gotchas
  • Consumes WCF contract packages: never take a breaking client bump mid-feature, and treat obsolete warnings as migration debt
Steps
  1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
  2. Raise automated test coverage first: ZDD trades the end-of-sprint manual gate for continuous automated confidence, so the tests are the entry ticket.
  3. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
  4. Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
  5. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
  6. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
  7. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

SQL Server exit

Feasible now (1 owned database)

The database is solely owned by this system, so the migration is self-contained. Recommended target: PostgreSQL.

Steps
  1. Inventory the schema and query surface of sqlserver:AutoMatchDatabase: tables, stored procedures, triggers, cross-database joins and anything else engine-specific.
  2. Confirm the target: PostgreSQL (relational model; keep transactions and joins, swap the engine).
  3. Data access is not through an ORM, so port the SQL by hand: translate T-SQL constructs, replace stored procedures with application code or target-native equivalents, and add integration tests around the queries that matter first.
  4. Stand up the target alongside SQL Server, backfill with an ETL pass (pgloader or an export/import job), then dual-write or replicate until parity is proven.
  5. Move reads to the target, watch correctness and latency, then cut writes over and keep SQL Server read-only until confidence is earned.
  6. Decommission the SQL Server database and remove the connection strings and firewall paths that pointed at it.

Containerisation

Ready to containerise

Modern runtime, no hosted legacy transport: this service can follow the estate's proven container path (Dockerfile, shared pipeline template, ECS via Terraform).

Steps
  1. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
  2. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
  3. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
  4. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

Recommended actions

No specific actions for this repo. It either needs only normal maintenance, or its work is covered by an estate-level action. See the full programme.

Assessment notes

backoffice-automatch-api

Purpose

Automates supplier confirmation. Proservartner's Traverse bots scan supplier emails, compare against components in Phenix, and post to this API: an InQuery status raises a discrepancy query for the Travel Counsellor to resolve, while Matched marks up costs, uploads/sends documents, and emails the customer a confirmation letter. Also exposes reporting and supplier-configuration lookups.

Tech stack

.NET 8 / ASP.NET Core with Mediator source-generated handlers, NSwag/Swashbuckle, Asp.Versioning, PhenixAuth authentication, Serilog, TC.ConnectionBroker (Api, Mongo, Wcf, HttpClient), TC.Phenix.Services.Client, WebApi.Logger. Includes a well-documented README and a CLAUDE.md with build/test commands.

Deployment

2 release pipelines (backoffice-automatch-api, backoffice-automatch-api - Stealth) fed by the backoffice-automatch-api build. CI YAML uses shared jobs/ci.yml templates (dotnet 8.x) and publishes a TC.BackOffice.AutoMatch.API.Client NuGet package. Environments include QA, Staging, Live, Training, DR.

Dependencies

  • Internal: brokered HTTP clients to PhenixUser (phenix-user-api) and Contact APIs; WCF clients (via TC.ConnectionBroker.Wcf) to Booking, MailTemplate (mailtemplate-service), and Document services; TC.Phenix.Services.Client NuGet.
  • External: Proservartner/Traverse bot platform is the primary consumer; New Relic APM.

Data stores

  • MongoDB: AutomatchSupplierConfiguration (supplier pilot/full-launch config) and automatchapi_logs (request/response logging used for the daily reporting extract).
  • SQL Server: db/AutoMatchDatabase/Change scripts add RequestLog/ResponseLog/DocumentType tables to a back-office database.

Integration points

REST (versioned, Swagger/NSwag client generation) inbound; WCF SOAP outbound to legacy Phenix services; brokered HTTP outbound to Phenix REST APIs.

Code health

Unit tests (Common.Tests) and integration tests present; CI templates enforce build/test. Last commit 2026-05-01 — recently active. Modern runtime, tidy layered structure (API / Common / DAL / Client).

Modernisation risks

  • Depends on legacy WCF endpoints (Booking, MailTemplate, Document services); those upstream services constrain retirement of SOAP.
  • SQL change scripts target a shared back-office database rather than an isolated schema.