Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / cybersource-api-integration

cybersource-api-integration

Payment gateway adapter that translates internal TC payment requests to the Cybersource (and Barclaycard) REST API and maps responses back, deployed as both on-prem and AWS variants.

100 · greenlowlooseAWS + on-premZDD: no excuseapi

Health score

100

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
25
Runs on supported modern .NET
Legacy transport / 15
15
No legacy WCF or SOAP surface
Test posture / 15
15
Good test coverage
Security hygiene / 15
15
No credentials found in source
Dangerous coupling / 15
15
No dangerous coupling detected
Activity / 10
10
Actively maintained
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 1002026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 100
No change since 2026-07-24 (100 to 100).

Facts

Languagescsharp, sql
FrameworksASP.NET Core 8, Dapper 2.1, Serilog, Swashbuckle 8
Runtimes.NET 8
Tests / CIgood / CI in place
Last commit2026-05-19
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainPayments and finance (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaShared platform
HostedAWS + on-prem Ships artefacts to both AWS and on-prem machines (see evidence below)
  • Release "\finance\payments\cybersource-api-integration": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\payments\cybersource-api-integration": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\payments\cybersource-api-integration": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\payments\cybersource-api-integration": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\payments\cybersource-api-integration": DR: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases3 release pipeline(s): \finance\payments\cybersource-api-integration; \finance\payments\cybersource-api-integration - Stealth; \finance\payments\cybersource-api-integration DB
Integrationrest, jwt
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

loose No binding mechanisms apply: this system needs no untangling work.

    Capability duplication

    Part of the Payment service provider adapters family (review): Modern, self-contained adapter

    Migration playbooks

    Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

    ZDD adoption

    No excuse

    Nothing technical is holding this repo on the three-week release. It either already deploys without downtime (AWS) or is a modern, well-tested service the automated stealth path can carry today. Modern runtime, good tests, no hosted legacy transport: the automated stealth path can carry it today.

    Dependencies and gotchas
    • 1 system(s) depend on this repo; during a rolling deploy they will talk to old and new versions at once, so responses must stay compatible
    Steps
    1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
    2. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
    3. Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
    4. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
    5. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
    6. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

    SQL Server exit

    Feasible now (1 owned database)

    The database is solely owned by this system, so the migration is self-contained. Recommended target: PostgreSQL.

    Steps
    1. Inventory the schema and query surface of sqlserver:Cybersource: tables, stored procedures, triggers, cross-database joins and anything else engine-specific.
    2. Confirm the target: PostgreSQL (relational model; keep transactions and joins, swap the engine).
    3. Data access is not through an ORM, so port the SQL by hand: translate T-SQL constructs, replace stored procedures with application code or target-native equivalents, and add integration tests around the queries that matter first.
    4. Stand up the target alongside SQL Server, backfill with an ETL pass (pgloader or an export/import job), then dual-write or replicate until parity is proven.
    5. Move reads to the target, watch correctness and latency, then cut writes over and keep SQL Server read-only until confidence is earned.
    6. Decommission the SQL Server database and remove the connection strings and firewall paths that pointed at it.

    Containerisation

    Ready to containerise

    Modern runtime, no hosted legacy transport: this service can follow the estate's proven container path (Dockerfile, shared pipeline template, ECS via Terraform).

    Steps
    1. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
    2. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
    3. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
    4. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

    Recommended actions

    No specific actions for this repo. It either needs only normal maintenance, or its work is covered by an estate-level action. See the full programme.

    Assessment notes

    cybersource-api-integration

    Purpose

    Adapter API for card payments: translates payment requests from internal systems into calls to Cybersource's REST API (also used for Barclaycard with separate merchant IDs) and maps responses back into TC models. The solution ships two hosts — TC.Cybersource.Api.OnPrem and TC.Cybersource.Api.AWS — plus shared application/mapping layers, PSP models, and a change-script-based database project.

    Tech stack

    C# on .NET 8 throughout (API, application, data access, and the CybersourceDatabase change-script project). Asp.Versioning, PhenixAuth JWT bearer, Serilog, Swashbuckle, Scrutor. Data access: Dapper stored-procedure runner over SQL Server and Mongo request logs (on-prem); TC.Persistence.DynamoDB repositories (AWS). AWS SDK (SecurityToken), TC.Payments.Logging/Models, TC.ConnectionBroker 1.22, TC.Exceptions.WebApiClient, TC.Diagnostics health checks. Backstage catalog-info.yaml present.

    Deployment

    Included as a prod application with 3 releases. Build pipelines: cybersource-api-integration (AWS containers, build-aws.yml), cybersource-api-integration OnPrem (build-onprem.yml), and cybersource-api-integration DB (build-db.yml); a build-packages.yml publishes shared packages. Release pipelines under \finance\payments\: main, Stealth, and DB. Per-environment appsettings across testqa/qa/datafixqa/liveproviderqa/preproduction/training/live.

    Dependencies

    Internal: tc-connectionbroker for SQL/Mongo/HTTP connection brokering and webapi-exceptions for exception reporting; consumes TC.Payments.* packages from the payments platform. External: Cybersource REST API (payments, secure acceptance, MOTO configurations) and Barclaycard via the same integration.

    Data stores

    sqlserver:Cybersource — merchant/provider/secure-acceptance configuration via stored procedures with numbered change scripts in db/CybersourceDatabase/Change. mongodb:cybersourceapi_logs — request/response logging. dynamodb:merchant-configurations — the AWS variant's configuration store via TC.Persistence.DynamoDB.

    Integration points

    Inbound REST/JSON API secured with PhenixAuth JWT; outbound HTTPS REST to Cybersource. Header propagation and correlation for the AWS container variant.

    Code health

    Eight test projects covering both hosts, application, response mappers and both data-access layers, plus an integration-test suite — good coverage. Documented key-rotation runbook in docs/. Actively maintained; last commit 2026-05-19.

    Modernisation risks

    Low overall: modern runtime, tests and CI. The main structural cost is maintaining parallel on-prem and AWS variants (duplicate hosts, data stores and pipelines); consolidating onto the AWS path would simplify. Numbered SQL change scripts are workable but less safe than a migrations framework.