Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / phenix-notifications-api

phenix-notifications-api

.NET 8 API that sends templated Phenix notification emails (team membership, gold-status and commission-rule events) by rendering Razor templates and dispatching through the legacy WCF mail service.

79 · greenlowkernelOn-premZDD: ready with guardrailsapi

Health score

79

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
25
Runs on supported modern .NET
Legacy transport / 15
6
Calls at least one legacy WCF endpoint
Test posture / 15
8
Some tests, coverage is thin
Security hygiene / 15
15
No credentials found in source
Dangerous coupling / 15
11
depends on pinning component(s): mail-service
Activity / 10
10
Actively maintained
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 792026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 79
No change since 2026-07-24 (79 to 79).

Facts

Languagescsharp
FrameworksASP.NET Core 8, MediatR, RazorEngine.NetCore
Runtimes.NET 8
Tests / CIsome / CI in place
Last commit2026-05-25
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainCustomer communications (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaPhenix
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "phenix-notifications-api": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "phenix-notifications-api": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "phenix-notifications-api": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "phenix-notifications-api": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "phenix-notifications-api": DR: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases2 release pipeline(s): phenix-notifications-api; phenix-notifications-api stealth
Integrationrest, wcf, jwt
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

kernel Bound into the core by 2 mechanism(s).

Detaches when its pinning dependencies are cut or multi-targeted (mail-service); and when its WCF surface gains a modern interface or its WCF calls move to one.

Capability duplication

Part of the Mail sending family (survivor): Built to replace the WCF pair but still delivers through the WCF client; complete the migration

Migration playbooks

Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

ZDD adoption

Ready with guardrails

Close: the deployment path exists, but specific checks are needed first, typically raising tests, auditing serialized data, or respecting a shared schema with expand and contract. Test coverage is thin; ZDD shifts the safety net onto automation.

Dependencies and gotchas
  • 1 system(s) depend on this repo; during a rolling deploy they will talk to old and new versions at once, so responses must stay compatible
  • Consumes WCF contract packages: never take a breaking client bump mid-feature, and treat obsolete warnings as migration debt
Steps
  1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
  2. Raise automated test coverage first: ZDD trades the end-of-sprint manual gate for continuous automated confidence, so the tests are the entry ticket.
  3. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
  4. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
  5. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
  6. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

SQL Server exit

Not applicable

No SQL Server dependency is recorded for this repo. Nothing to migrate.

Containerisation

Ready to containerise

Modern runtime, no hosted legacy transport: this service can follow the estate's proven container path (Dockerfile, shared pipeline template, ECS via Terraform).

Steps
  1. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
  2. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
  3. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
  4. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

Recommended actions

No specific actions for this repo. It either needs only normal maintenance, or its work is covered by an estate-level action. See the full programme.

Assessment notes

phenix-notifications-api

Purpose

Notification-sending API intended (per its README) to replace the legacy Mail and MailTemplate WCF services. A single MailNotificationController accepts notification requests; MediatR command handlers (new team member, remove team member, team cover, hit/close-to/removed gold, commission rule, commission payment rule) render HTML email bodies from embedded resx/Razor templates and hand them to the mail service.

Tech stack

C# .NET 8 ASP.NET Core with Asp.Versioning, MediatR 12, RazorEngine.NetCore templating over embedded EmailTemplates/EmailStrings/EmailConfigs resources, PhenixAuth JWT authentication scheme, Swashbuckle, TC.Diagnostics health checks, Nerdbank-style version.json versioning, shared Directory.Build.props with the internal Production NuGet feed.

Deployment

prod_application with 2 releases. YAML build (azure-pipelines.yml, shared InternalOSS templates v1.0, SDK 8.x) feeding release pipelines phenix-notifications-api and phenix-notifications-api stealth. Hosted under base path /api/phenixnotifications; New Relic app name configured in live settings.

Dependencies

Internal: TC.ConnectionBroker (+ Api, Wcf) → tc-connectionbroker; TC.Exceptions.WebApiClient → tc-exceptions; TC.Mail.ServiceClient/ServiceContract → mail-service (actual email dispatch); TC.Phenix.CompanyInfo → company-info-api. External: New Relic monitoring.

Data stores

None — the service is stateless; templates are embedded resources and delivery is delegated to the mail service.

Integration points

Inbound REST with JWT auth. Outbound WCF call to the central mail service via the WCF ConnectionBroker — a wcf-client edge on an otherwise modern stack.

Code health

One xUnit test project with nine test files covering every mail command handler — reasonable for the codebase size, though the controller and MailService mapping layer are untested. YAML CI. Actively maintained (last commit 2026-05-25). README is short but real (not boilerplate).

Modernisation risks

Low priority: modern .NET 8, tested, YAML CI. The only legacy edge is the outbound dependency on the WCF mail-service; ironically the service exists to retire the mail/mailtemplate WCF services but still delivers through one. Swapping to the MassTransit-based tc-mail-sender contracts (as phenix-marketing-campaigns-api does) would remove the last WCF hop.