Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / phenix-tcselfservice-api

phenix-tcselfservice-api

ASP.NET Core 2.0 API letting travel counsellors self-serve their public website details — profile, testimonials, blogs, social media and profile images — from Phenix.

49 · redhighkernelOn-premZDD: needs workapi

Health score

49

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
0
.NET Framework, out of mainstream support
Legacy transport / 15
6
Calls at least one legacy WCF endpoint
Test posture / 15
8
Some tests, coverage is thin
Security hygiene / 15
15
No credentials found in source
Dangerous coupling / 15
11
depends on pinning component(s): mail-service
Activity / 10
5
No commit in over a year
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 492026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 49
No change since 2026-07-24 (49 to 49).

Facts

Languagescsharp
FrameworksASP.NET Core 2.0, Autofac
Runtimes.NET Framework 4.6.2
Tests / CIsome / CI in place
Last commit2025-06-17
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainAgent tools and community (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areamyTC
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "\marketing\self-service\phenix-tcselfservice-api Stealth": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\self-service\phenix-tcselfservice-api Stealth": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\self-service\phenix-tcselfservice-api develop": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\self-service\phenix-tcselfservice-api release": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\self-service\phenix-tcselfservice-api release": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases3 release pipeline(s): \marketing\self-service\phenix-tcselfservice-api Stealth; \marketing\self-service\phenix-tcselfservice-api develop; \marketing\self-service\phenix-tcselfservice-api release
Integrationrest, wcf, jwt
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

kernel Bound into the core by 2 mechanism(s).

Detaches when its pinning dependencies are cut or multi-targeted (mail-service); and when its WCF surface gains a modern interface or its WCF calls move to one.

Migration playbooks

Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

ZDD adoption

Needs work

Feasible through the Workflow Engine's rolling drain, but real preparation is needed: dual-version discipline, better tests, or schema care before at-will release is sensible. Legacy runtime: the rolling drain works (stealth releases prove it) but relies on fix-forward risk rather than dual-version safety.

Dependencies and gotchas
  • 1 system(s) depend on this repo; during a rolling deploy they will talk to old and new versions at once, so responses must stay compatible
  • Consumes WCF contract packages: never take a breaking client bump mid-feature, and treat obsolete warnings as migration debt
Steps
  1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
  2. Raise automated test coverage first: ZDD trades the end-of-sprint manual gate for continuous automated confidence, so the tests are the entry ticket.
  3. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
  4. Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
  5. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
  6. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
  7. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

SQL Server exit

Blocked by a shared database

sqlserver:TCDB, sqlserver:TravelCounsellors are shared, so this system cannot change engine on its own: every sharer moves in convoy. Either agree the move with all sharers as one programme, or first split this system's data out behind an owned API, then follow the steps below.

Blockers
Steps
  1. Inventory the schema and query surface of sqlserver:TCDB, sqlserver:TravelCounsellors: tables, stored procedures, triggers, cross-database joins and anything else engine-specific.
  2. Confirm the target: PostgreSQL (relational model; keep transactions and joins, swap the engine).
  3. Replatform to modern .NET first (see the recommended actions): current PostgreSQL and MongoDB drivers and EF Core providers target modern .NET, and doing one risky change at a time is cheaper than doing two.
  4. Data access is not through an ORM, so port the SQL by hand: translate T-SQL constructs, replace stored procedures with application code or target-native equivalents, and add integration tests around the queries that matter first.
  5. Stand up the target alongside SQL Server, backfill with an ETL pass (pgloader or an export/import job), then dual-write or replicate until parity is proven.
  6. Move reads to the target, watch correctness and latency, then cut writes over and keep SQL Server read-only until confidence is earned.
  7. Decommission the SQL Server database and remove the connection strings and firewall paths that pointed at it.

Containerisation

Feasible after replatforming

Appropriate, but the .NET Framework runtime has to go first; container work rides along with the replatform rather than preceding it.

Blockers
  • .NET Framework only runs on Windows; practical (Linux) containers need modern .NET
Steps
  1. Replatform to modern .NET first (see the recommended actions). Containerising then becomes routine.
  2. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
  3. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
  4. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
  5. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

Recommended actions

Replatform phenix-tcselfservice-api to modern .NET

Runs on .NET Framework 4.6.2, out of mainstream support. Blocked until stage 2 cuts: mail-service.

Impact: Unblocks 1 dependent system(s)

proposed

Assessment notes

phenix-tcselfservice-api

Purpose

Backend for the counsellor self-service capability: Read/Write controllers expose a travel counsellor's public website details (personal/contact profile, testimonials, blogs, social media links, profile images via a media-server repository) so they can be viewed and edited from Phenix. Domain managers integrate with the MyTC API and the user-account services.

Tech stack

C# ASP.NET Core 2.0 MVC hosted on .NET Framework 4.6.2 (SDK-style csproj), Autofac DI, Swashbuckle 4 Swagger with API versioning, PhenixAuthLib JWT authentication, raw System.Data.SqlClient stored-procedure data access through TC.ConnectionBroker 1.11, and WCF clients via System.ServiceModel packages.

Deployment

Three release pipelines under \marketing\self-service\ (Stealth, develop, release; release_count 3) from the phenix-tcselfservice-api build pipeline, with azure-pipelines.yml in the repo. Deploys to IIS via PowerShell scripts in deployment/ (app pool/website configuration, Slack webhook notification).

Dependencies

Internal packages: TC.ConnectionBroker (Api, Sql, Wcf), TC.Exceptions.WebApiClient + middleware, TC.Phenix.ServiceManagement, TC.Mail.ServiceContract, TC.Public.WebAPI.ServiceContracts (public-api), TC.UserAccount and TC.UserAccountLegacy service clients. External: Slack webhook in deployment scripts.

Data stores

No owned database. Repositories read/write the shared TCDB and TravelCounsellors (public website) SQL Server databases via ConnectionBroker-resolved connection strings.

Integration points

Inbound REST with JWT bearer auth. Outbound WCF/SOAP to the user-account (current and legacy) services and public API, plus REST to the MyTC API via ConnectionBroker.

Code health

One domain test project with ~50 MSTest tests over managers, services and commands — reasonable domain coverage, nothing on the controllers. The README is copied from the "TC Web Details" project and documents a different API and database, so it is misleading. Last commit 2025-06-17.

Modernisation risks

High: ASP.NET Core 2.0 is long end-of-life and hosted on .NET Framework 4.6.2, with old ConnectionBroker 1.11 packages and WCF client coupling to two user-account services. Functionality overlaps the public-website domain (tc-web-details-api, travelcounsellors-net), so consolidation onto a supported .NET 8 service is the likely path.