Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / tc-permissions-api

tc-permissions-api

ASP.NET Core 8 API that decides whether a user/team may view or edit an entity (booking, quote, customer), backed by MongoDB permission records with team-aware role expansion.

88 · greenlowlooseOn-premZDD: ready with guardrailsapi

Health score

88

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
25
Runs on supported modern .NET
Legacy transport / 15
15
No legacy WCF or SOAP surface
Test posture / 15
8
Some tests, coverage is thin
Security hygiene / 15
15
No credentials found in source
Dangerous coupling / 15
15
No dangerous coupling detected
Activity / 10
5
No commit in over a year
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 882026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 88
No change since 2026-07-24 (88 to 88).

Facts

Languagescsharp
FrameworksASP.NET Core 8, MediatR 12, FluentValidation 11, Swashbuckle/NSwag, GraphQL.Client
Runtimes.NET 8
Tests / CIsome / CI in place
Last commit2025-06-10
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainIdentity and access (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaShared platform
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "tc-permissions-api": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "tc-permissions-api": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "tc-permissions-api": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "tc-permissions-api": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "tc-permissions-api": DR: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases1 release pipeline(s): tc-permissions-api
Integrationrest, graphql, jwt
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

loose No binding mechanisms apply: this system needs no untangling work.

    Migration playbooks

    Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

    ZDD adoption

    Ready with guardrails

    Close: the deployment path exists, but specific checks are needed first, typically raising tests, auditing serialized data, or respecting a shared schema with expand and contract. Test coverage is thin; ZDD shifts the safety net onto automation.

    Dependencies and gotchas
    • 1 system(s) depend on this repo; during a rolling deploy they will talk to old and new versions at once, so responses must stay compatible
    Steps
    1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
    2. Raise automated test coverage first: ZDD trades the end-of-sprint manual gate for continuous automated confidence, so the tests are the entry ticket.
    3. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
    4. Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
    5. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
    6. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
    7. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

    SQL Server exit

    Not applicable

    No SQL Server dependency is recorded for this repo. Nothing to migrate.

    Containerisation

    Ready to containerise

    Modern runtime, no hosted legacy transport: this service can follow the estate's proven container path (Dockerfile, shared pipeline template, ECS via Terraform).

    Steps
    1. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
    2. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
    3. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
    4. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

    Recommended actions

    No specific actions for this repo. It either needs only normal maintenance, or its work is covered by an estate-level action. See the full programme.

    Assessment notes

    tc-permissions-api

    Purpose

    Central permissions decision point for the Phenix estate: single or batched requests of {teamId, salesPersonId, entityType, entityId, action} are evaluated against permission documents in MongoDB, with role expansion, team lookups via the teams API, and Phenix-booking-to-team resolution via the Accounts GraphQL API. It publishes TC.Permissions.Contract and an NSwag-generated TC.Permissions.Api.Client for consumers (e.g. tc-gift-registry).

    Tech stack

    C# on .NET 8, layered solution (API, Application, DataAccess, Contract, Api.Client, TeamsApiIntegration, AccountsGraphQLIntegration). MediatR handlers with validation and in-memory caching pipeline behaviours, FluentValidation, Asp.Versioning, Swashbuckle plus checked-in swagger spec, PhenixAuth JWT plus a TC API-key filter, TC.ConnectionBroker (Api/HttpClient/Mongo), health checks for the database, teams API and GraphQL endpoint.

    Deployment

    Included as prod_application with 1 release: release pipeline tc-permissions-api from build tc-permissions-api. YAML CI via shared templates (SDK 8.x) building the API and packing the Contract and Api.Client packages. Per-environment appsettings (qa, training, preproduction, live, liveproviderqa, datafixqa); IIS web.config present, New Relic app naming under the Phenix API umbrella.

    Dependencies

    Internal: TC.ConnectionBroker.* (tc-connectionbroker), TC.Exceptions.WebApiClient.AspNetCore (webapi-exceptions), TC.Teams.Contracts (teams-service) for team membership, and the TC Accounts GraphQL API for booking-to-team resolution (source repo not identifiable in included.json). External: New Relic APM.

    Data stores

    Owns the Permissions MongoDB database plus a permissions_logs Mongo database for request/response logging, accessed through brokered Mongo connections.

    Integration points

    REST/JSON API (versioned, Swagger, generated client) secured with PhenixAuth JWT and an API-key filter; outbound REST to the teams API and outbound GraphQL to the Accounts API.

    Code health

    Two test projects (Application unit tests and API integration tests) totalling ~29 xunit tests — real but modest coverage for an authorisation-critical service. README documents the request model and design (copied from the development-guides wiki). Last commit 2025-06-10; head-office salesperson IDs are hardcoded in appsettings.

    Modernisation risks

    Low on stack (modern .NET 8, YAML CI). The risk profile is operational rather than technical: it is an authorisation service other repos depend on (high fan-in via its client package), so its modest test coverage and the hardcoded head-office ID list in configuration deserve hardening; caching behaviour on permission queries also needs care around staleness after permission updates.