Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / trustpayments-api-integration

trustpayments-api-integration

Payment gateway adapter translating internal TC payment requests (MOTO, hosted payment pages, token payments) to the Trust Payments webservices API and mapping responses back.

95 · greenlowlooseOn-premZDD: no excuseapi

Health score

95

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
25
Runs on supported modern .NET
Legacy transport / 15
15
No legacy WCF or SOAP surface
Test posture / 15
15
Good test coverage
Security hygiene / 15
15
No credentials found in source
Dangerous coupling / 15
15
No dangerous coupling detected
Activity / 10
5
No commit in over a year
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 952026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 95
No change since 2026-07-24 (95 to 95).

Facts

Languagescsharp, sql
FrameworksASP.NET Core 8, Entity Framework Core
Runtimes.NET 8
Tests / CIgood / CI in place
Last commit2025-02-05
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainPayments and finance (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaShared platform
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "\finance\payments\trustpayments-api-integration": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\payments\trustpayments-api-integration": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\payments\trustpayments-api-integration": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\payments\trustpayments-api-integration": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\payments\trustpayments-api-integration": DR: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases2 release pipeline(s): \finance\payments\trustpayments-api-integration; \finance\payments\trustpayments-api-integration DB
Integrationrest, jwt
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

No risk flags recorded.

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

loose No binding mechanisms apply: this system needs no untangling work.

    Depends on / used by

    Used by (0)
    No internal dependents.

    Data stores
    sqlserver:TrustPaymentsmongodb:trustpaymentsapi_logs

    Capability duplication

    Part of the Payment service provider adapters family (review): Near-duplicate of the same pattern

    Migration playbooks

    Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

    ZDD adoption

    No excuse

    Nothing technical is holding this repo on the three-week release. It either already deploys without downtime (AWS) or is a modern, well-tested service the automated stealth path can carry today. Modern runtime, good tests, no hosted legacy transport: the automated stealth path can carry it today.

    Steps
    1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
    2. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
    3. Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
    4. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
    5. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
    6. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

    SQL Server exit

    Feasible now (1 owned database)

    The database is solely owned by this system, so the migration is self-contained. Recommended target: PostgreSQL.

    Steps
    1. Inventory the schema and query surface of sqlserver:TrustPayments: tables, stored procedures, triggers, cross-database joins and anything else engine-specific.
    2. Confirm the target: PostgreSQL (relational model; keep transactions and joins, swap the engine).
    3. The repo already uses Entity Framework: swap the provider (Npgsql for PostgreSQL) behind the existing model, then burn down the provider-specific differences the test suite finds.
    4. Stand up the target alongside SQL Server, backfill with an ETL pass (pgloader or an export/import job), then dual-write or replicate until parity is proven.
    5. Move reads to the target, watch correctness and latency, then cut writes over and keep SQL Server read-only until confidence is earned.
    6. Decommission the SQL Server database and remove the connection strings and firewall paths that pointed at it.

    Containerisation

    Ready to containerise

    Modern runtime, no hosted legacy transport: this service can follow the estate's proven container path (Dockerfile, shared pipeline template, ECS via Terraform).

    Steps
    1. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
    2. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
    3. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
    4. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

    Recommended actions

    No specific actions for this repo. It either needs only normal maintenance, or its work is covered by an estate-level action. See the full programme.

    Assessment notes

    trustpayments-api-integration

    Purpose

    Adapter API between internal payment flows (Admin Studio, Phenix) and the Trust Payments (Secure Trading) PSP. Controllers cover MOTO payments, hosted payment pages, transactions and request logs; it handles token payments (card-on-file, storing only first-six/last-four) and site-reference/alias routing from a ProviderConfiguration table. Also ships branded hosted payment-page HTML templates and a test website.

    Tech stack

    C# .NET 8 ASP.NET Core with API versioning, PhenixAuth JWT bearer, Swashbuckle, Scrutor, EF Core SqlServer over ConnectionBroker, TC.Payments.* shared payment models/logging with obfuscation of sensitive fields, JWT package for Trust Payments notification verification. xUnit unit tests plus SpecFlow integration tests.

    Deployment

    prod_application, release_count 2. YAML pipelines: azure-pipelines.yml (API, .NET 8 SDK, shared templates), build-db.yml (change-script database) and build-packages.yml (PspModels package). Build pipelines trustpayments-api-integration and ... DB feed release pipelines under \finance\payments\ for the API and database, with QA/Staging/Live/Training/DR release stages documented in the README.

    Dependencies

    Internal packages: TC.ConnectionBroker.* (Sql, Mongo, Api — tc-connectionbroker), TC.Exceptions.WebApiClient.AspNetCore (tc-exceptions), plus TC.Payments.Models/JsonMessageTransport/Logging.Obfuscation from the shared payments platform. External: Trust Payments JSON webservices (webservices.securetrading.net) and hosted payment pages (payments.securetrading.net).

    Data stores

    SQL Server TrustPayments database (EF Core via ConnectionBroker connection TrustPayments; Create/Change script-based DB project holding provider/site configuration and payment data). MongoDB trustpaymentsapi_logs for request/response logging.

    Integration points

    Inbound REST with PhenixAuth JWT from internal payment callers. Outbound REST to Trust Payments, with JWT-signed notifications and redirect handling for hosted pages; sensitive payment fields obfuscated in logs.

    Code health

    Good: unit and SpecFlow integration test projects, an unusually thorough README documenting payment flows, build/release links and PSP behaviours (with diagrams in docs/). Last commit 2025-02-05 — quiet but not abandoned.

    Modernisation risks

    Low: modern .NET 8, YAML CI, tests and strong documentation. Main considerations are PCI-adjacent sensitivity (tokenisation rules, obfuscation logic) and duplication of the PSP-adapter pattern with cybersource-api-integration — a consolidation opportunity rather than a risk.