Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / vccprovider-conferma

vccprovider-conferma

ASP.NET Core 8 provider adapter API that requests and manages virtual credit cards from Conferma (Barclays) over a signed SOAP API, called by vcc-service.

85 · greenlowlooseOn-premZDD: no excuseapisecrets in source

Health score

85

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
25
Runs on supported modern .NET
Legacy transport / 15
15
No legacy WCF or SOAP surface
Test posture / 15
15
Good test coverage
Security hygiene / 15
0
Credentials or keys committed to source
Dangerous coupling / 15
15
No dangerous coupling detected
Activity / 10
10
Actively maintained
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 852026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 85
No change since 2026-07-24 (85 to 85).

Facts

Languagescsharp
FrameworksASP.NET Core 8, MediatR, Serilog
Runtimes.NET 8
Tests / CIgood / CI in place
Last commit2026-04-01
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainPayments and finance (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaPhenix
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "\finance\payments\vccprovider-conferma Database": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\vcc\vccprovider-conferma": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\vcc\vccprovider-conferma": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\vcc\vccprovider-conferma": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\finance\vcc\vccprovider-conferma": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases2 release pipeline(s): \finance\payments\vccprovider-conferma Database; \finance\vcc\vccprovider-conferma
Integrationrest, soap
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

loose No binding mechanisms apply: this system needs no untangling work.

    Migration playbooks

    Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

    ZDD adoption

    No excuse

    Nothing technical is holding this repo on the three-week release. It either already deploys without downtime (AWS) or is a modern, well-tested service the automated stealth path can carry today. Modern runtime, good tests, no hosted legacy transport: the automated stealth path can carry it today.

    Dependencies and gotchas
    • 1 system(s) depend on this repo; during a rolling deploy they will talk to old and new versions at once, so responses must stay compatible
    Steps
    1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
    2. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
    3. Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
    4. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
    5. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
    6. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

    SQL Server exit

    Feasible now (1 owned database)

    The database is solely owned by this system, so the migration is self-contained. Recommended target: PostgreSQL.

    Steps
    1. Inventory the schema and query surface of sqlserver:VccProviderConferma: tables, stored procedures, triggers, cross-database joins and anything else engine-specific.
    2. Confirm the target: PostgreSQL (relational model; keep transactions and joins, swap the engine).
    3. Data access is not through an ORM, so port the SQL by hand: translate T-SQL constructs, replace stored procedures with application code or target-native equivalents, and add integration tests around the queries that matter first.
    4. Stand up the target alongside SQL Server, backfill with an ETL pass (pgloader or an export/import job), then dual-write or replicate until parity is proven.
    5. Move reads to the target, watch correctness and latency, then cut writes over and keep SQL Server read-only until confidence is earned.
    6. Decommission the SQL Server database and remove the connection strings and firewall paths that pointed at it.

    Containerisation

    Ready to containerise

    Modern runtime, no hosted legacy transport: this service can follow the estate's proven container path (Dockerfile, shared pipeline template, ECS via Terraform).

    Steps
    1. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
    2. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
    3. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
    4. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

    Recommended actions

    Rotate the credentials committed to vccprovider-conferma

    Risk flags indicate credentials or keys in source (secrets-in-source). Rotate now and enable secret scanning in CI; this is independent of all other work.

    Impact: Closes a live security exposure at near-zero cost

    proposed

    Assessment notes

    vccprovider-conferma

    Purpose

    Provider adapter in the VCC estate: exposes a REST API (consumed by vcc-service via the VccProviderConferma ConnectionBroker target) that translates card requests into calls to the Conferma Payments SOAP API (papi.conferma.com, Barclays-fronted), including deployment-specific XML message signing with an X.509 key pair, settlement file handling (Excel/CSV conversion) and company configuration.

    Tech stack

    C# on .NET 8 throughout: ASP.NET Core Web API with MediatR handlers, FluentValidation, Asp.Versioning, Swashbuckle, PhenixAuth authentication, Serilog, Correlate. SOAP client generated with dotnet-svcutil from the checked-in Conferma WSDL; System.Security.Cryptography.Xml for message signing; ClosedXML/CsvHelper for settlement files; Dapper + System.Data.SqlClient DAL. db/VccProviderConferma is a database project with Create/Change scripts.

    Deployment

    prod_application with 2 releases: build pipelines vccprovider-conferma and vccprovider-conferma DB, release pipelines \finance\vcc\vccprovider-conferma and \finance\payments\vccprovider-conferma Database. YAML pipelines (build.yml, build-db.yml) using shared azure-pipelines-templates. Hosted under /api/vccprovider-conferma on the shared services domain.

    Dependencies

    Internal: TC.ConnectionBroker (Api/Sql/Mongo), TC.Exceptions.WebApiClient, TC.Diagnostics.HealthChecks, and TC.VirtualCreditCard.Models.Core shared models from vcc-service (NuGet package, not a runtime call). External: the Conferma Payments API (SOAP, cert and live endpoints).

    Data stores

    SQL Server VccProviderConferma database (API config, signing certs, company config; own DB project) and MongoDB vcc_conferma_api_logs for request/response logging.

    Integration points

    Inbound REST from vcc-service; outbound SOAP to Conferma with signed XML messages.

    Code health

    Good: three xunit test projects (~183 test files) including a service-integration fixture suite; substantive README covering message signing and certificate generation with vendor docs in docs/. Last commit 2026-04-01. One concern: DB change scripts embed a live Conferma API key and an encrypted password blob directly in source (db/.../Change/157196*.sql).

    Modernisation risks

    Low priority - modern .NET 8 stack with good tests and YAML CI. Residual risks: credentials committed in DB change scripts should be moved to a secret store; the SOAP + XML-signing integration is vendor-locked and certificate rotation is a manual documented procedure.