backoffice-receipt-service
Service for creating, updating and querying customer receipts, consuming receipt messages from Redis streams and orchestrating emails, documents and payment-related updates across backoffice services.
Health score
0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.
Facts
| Languages | csharp |
| Frameworks | ASP.NET Core 8 |
| Runtimes | .NET 8, .NET Standard 2.0 (libraries) |
| Tests / CI | some / CI in place |
| Last commit | 2026-07-10 |
| Owner | Owner unknown (mapping to be curated) |
| Domain | Payments and finance (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override) |
| Product area | Phenix |
| Hosted | On-prem Deployed to our own machines
|
| Releases | 2 release pipeline(s): \finance\backoffice\backoffice-receipt-service CI; \finance\backoffice\backoffice-receipt-service Stealth |
| Integration | rest, wcf, redis-streams |
| Source | Open in Azure DevOps |
Dependencies in context
Entanglement
kernel Bound into the core by 3 mechanism(s).
- Pinning dependency: mailtemplate-service
- Speaks WCF (client)
- Shares core database sqlserver:Phenix
Detaches when its pinning dependencies are cut or multi-targeted (mailtemplate-service); and when its WCF surface gains a modern interface or its WCF calls move to one; and when the shared database group it belongs to gains an owned API or completes schema separation (sqlserver:Phenix).
Migration playbooks
Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.
ZDD adoption
Ready with guardrailsClose: the deployment path exists, but specific checks are needed first, typically raising tests, auditing serialized data, or respecting a shared schema with expand and contract. Shares sqlserver:Phenix: expand and contract is mandatory for any schema change. Test coverage is thin; ZDD shifts the safety net onto automation.
- 1 system(s) depend on this repo; during a rolling deploy they will talk to old and new versions at once, so responses must stay compatible
- Consumes WCF contract packages: never take a breaking client bump mid-feature, and treat obsolete warnings as migration debt
- Shares sqlserver:Phenix with 21 system(s): destructive schema change is prohibited in a single release; expand and contract only
- Serialized state or messages in flight (Redis or queues): new code must deserialize objects written by the previous version
- Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
- Raise automated test coverage first: ZDD trades the end-of-sprint manual gate for continuous automated confidence, so the tests are the entry ticket.
- Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
- Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
- Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
- Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
- Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.
SQL Server exit
Blocked by a shared core databasesqlserver:Phenix is shared, so this system cannot change engine on its own: every sharer moves in convoy. The stage 4 work (named owner, declarative schema, owned API) has to land first; after that, the steps below apply to whatever slice this system ends up owning.
- Inventory the schema and query surface of sqlserver:Phenix: tables, stored procedures, triggers, cross-database joins and anything else engine-specific.
- Confirm the target: PostgreSQL (relational model; keep transactions and joins, swap the engine).
- Data access is not through an ORM, so port the SQL by hand: translate T-SQL constructs, replace stored procedures with application code or target-native equivalents, and add integration tests around the queries that matter first.
- Stand up the target alongside SQL Server, backfill with an ETL pass (pgloader or an export/import job), then dual-write or replicate until parity is proven.
- Move reads to the target, watch correctness and latency, then cut writes over and keep SQL Server read-only until confidence is earned.
- Decommission the SQL Server database and remove the connection strings and firewall paths that pointed at it.
Containerisation
Ready to containeriseModern runtime, no hosted legacy transport: this service can follow the estate's proven container path (Dockerfile, shared pipeline template, ECS via Terraform).
- Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
- Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
- Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
- Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.
Recommended actions
No specific actions for this repo. It either needs only normal maintenance, or its work is covered by an estate-level action. See the full programme.
Assessment notes
backoffice-receipt-service
Purpose
Creates, updates and queries receipts for bookings. A Redis-stream reader (TC.ReceiptService.StreamReader) processes receipt messages (e.g. card payment authorised), generates customer receipts, sends failure notification emails, and triggers documentation/email flows. Publishes a TC.ReceiptService.Client NuGet package for consumers.
Tech stack
C# solution on .NET 8 (ASP.NET Core WebApi plus many facade libraries; a few netstandard2.0 primitives). Uses MediatR, Polly, Scrutor, NSwag/Swashbuckle, Asp.Versioning, PhenixAuth authentication, Correlate, TC.ConnectionBroker (Sql/Wcf/Redis/Api brokers) and TC.Streams (Redis provider).
Deployment
Actively deployed (prod_application, 2 releases). Build pipelines backoffice-receipt-service and backoffice-receipt-service CI (YAML using shared templates, .NET 8 SDK); release pipelines \finance\backoffice\backoffice-receipt-service CI and ...Stealth. Hosted under phenixservices.travelcounsellors.com/services/backoffice-receipt-service.
Dependencies
Internal estate services called via facades: user-account service (WCF, TC.UserAccount.ServiceContract from backoffice-useraccount-service), mail template service (WCF, TC.Mail.Template.ServiceContract), booking documentation service (WCF, TC.Documentation.Booking.Contract), teams API (REST), honeymoon API (REST), contact API (REST), plus portal-users WCF service, contact-centre service and Phenix booking services (TC.Phenix.Services.Client). External third-party dependencies: none identified.
Data stores
SQL Server accessed through TC.ConnectionBroker.Sql (shared Phenix backoffice database). Redis used both for TC.Streams message consumption and TC.Cache.
Integration points
Inbound versioned REST API with Swagger and Phenix auth. Outbound WCF (System.ServiceModel) to legacy services, REST/HTTP facades via ConnectionBroker.Api, and Redis-stream consumption for receipt events.
Code health
Two test projects (WebApi.Tests including command-handler tests, StreamReader.Tests). YAML CI with NuGet publishing. Last commit 2026-07-10 — actively maintained.
Modernisation risks
Runtime is modern (.NET 8), but the service is tightly coupled to legacy WCF endpoints (user account, mail template, documentation, portal users, contact centre) and to the shared Phenix SQL database, which constrains independent evolution. Large facade sprawl (10+ facade projects) adds maintenance overhead.