Platform Evolution
Assessment run-2026-07-27-1 · 213 of 213 repos assessed
Repos / phenix-marketing-campaigns-api

phenix-marketing-campaigns-api

.NET 8 API managing marketing campaigns, templates, recipient lists and segmentation criteria over MongoDB, sending campaign email via MassTransit and importing legacy campaign data from the Phenix SQL database.

88 · greenlowkernelOn-premZDD: ready with guardrailsapi

Health score

88

0 to 100 across seven weighted factors; nothing is hidden. Green is 75 and above, amber 50 to 74, red below 50. How scoring works.


Runtime currency / 25
25
Runs on supported modern .NET
Legacy transport / 15
15
No legacy WCF or SOAP surface
Test posture / 15
15
Good test coverage
Security hygiene / 15
15
No credentials found in source
Dangerous coupling / 15
3
shares a core database (sqlserver:Phenix); depends on pinning component(s): phenix-feature-service
Activity / 10
10
Actively maintained
Deployment hygiene / 5
5
CI in place
Health over time
2026-07-24 (run-2026-07-24-1): 882026-07-27 (run-2026-07-27-1): 88
No change since 2026-07-24 (88 to 88).

Facts

Languagescsharp
FrameworksASP.NET Core 8, MediatR, FluentValidation
Runtimes.NET 8
Tests / CIgood / CI in place
Last commit2026-02-16
OwnerOwner unknown (mapping to be curated)
DomainCustomer communications (system generated; curate in repo-owners.json to override)
Product areaPhenix
HostedOn-prem Deployed to our own machines
  • Release "\marketing\marketing-campaigns\phenix-marketing-campaigns-api master": QA: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\marketing-campaigns\phenix-marketing-campaigns-api release": Staging: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\marketing-campaigns\phenix-marketing-campaigns-api release": Production: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\marketing-campaigns\phenix-marketing-campaigns-api release": Training: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
  • Release "\marketing\marketing-campaigns\phenix-marketing-campaigns-api release": DR: deployment-group phase (agents on our own machines)
Releases2 release pipeline(s): \marketing\marketing-campaigns\phenix-marketing-campaigns-api master; \marketing\marketing-campaigns\phenix-marketing-campaigns-api release
Integrationrest, masstransit, sqs, redis, jwt
SourceOpen in Azure DevOps

Risk flags

Each flag links to its glossary definition.

Dependencies in context

Laying out the graph…
greenamberreddata store (square, dashed link)Node size follows fan-in. Click any node to open it.

Entanglement

kernel Bound into the core by 2 mechanism(s).

Detaches when its pinning dependencies are cut or multi-targeted (phenix-feature-service); and when the shared database group it belongs to gains an owned API or completes schema separation (sqlserver:Phenix).

Migration playbooks

Generated from this repo's assessment data: what is feasible, what blocks it, and the steps in order. Ratings: green means actionable now, amber means sequence other work first, red means blocked, grey means not applicable.

ZDD adoption

Ready with guardrails

Close: the deployment path exists, but specific checks are needed first, typically raising tests, auditing serialized data, or respecting a shared schema with expand and contract. Shares sqlserver:Phenix: expand and contract is mandatory for any schema change.

Blockers
Dependencies and gotchas
  • Shares sqlserver:Phenix with 21 system(s): destructive schema change is prohibited in a single release; expand and contract only
  • Serialized state or messages in flight (Redis or queues): new code must deserialize objects written by the previous version
  • Feature flags come from phenix-feature-service (WCF-only): flag reads themselves are a legacy dependency to watch
Steps
  1. Adopt the four-stage discipline from the ZDD engineering standard: pre-deployment compatibility, deployment, feature activation behind a flag, post-release cleanup.
  2. Make every change dual-version safe: backwards-compatible APIs (new major version for breaking wire changes), expand and contract for any schema change, and consumers tolerant of unknown fields.
  3. Audit serialized data: anything in Redis, queues or shared caches must deserialize cleanly across adjacent versions.
  4. Wrap behaviour changes in feature flags so code deploys dark and release becomes a business decision, not a deployment event.
  5. Route deployments through the Workflow Engine's automated drain, deploy, health-check, return cycle (the path proven by the first automated production run in mid-2026).
  6. Verify with area-scoped regression rather than the whole-platform cycle, and watch error rates after rollout with automated rollback on alert.

SQL Server exit

Blocked by a shared core database

sqlserver:Phenix is shared, so this system cannot change engine on its own: every sharer moves in convoy. The stage 4 work (named owner, declarative schema, owned API) has to land first; after that, the steps below apply to whatever slice this system ends up owning.

Blockers
Steps
  1. Inventory the schema and query surface of sqlserver:Phenix: tables, stored procedures, triggers, cross-database joins and anything else engine-specific.
  2. Confirm the target: PostgreSQL (relational model; keep transactions and joins, swap the engine).
  3. Data access is not through an ORM, so port the SQL by hand: translate T-SQL constructs, replace stored procedures with application code or target-native equivalents, and add integration tests around the queries that matter first.
  4. Stand up the target alongside SQL Server, backfill with an ETL pass (pgloader or an export/import job), then dual-write or replicate until parity is proven.
  5. Move reads to the target, watch correctness and latency, then cut writes over and keep SQL Server read-only until confidence is earned.
  6. Decommission the SQL Server database and remove the connection strings and firewall paths that pointed at it.

Containerisation

Ready to containerise

Modern runtime, no hosted legacy transport: this service can follow the estate's proven container path (Dockerfile, shared pipeline template, ECS via Terraform).

Steps
  1. Add a Dockerfile and make the app read all configuration from environment variables and the secrets manager, never from machine-local files.
  2. Log to stdout and expose a health check endpoint so ECS can supervise it.
  3. Adopt the shared ci.yml pipeline template with the container parameters (awsRegion, containerAfterBuild, ecsTerraformRepo), which is exactly how the estate's existing AWS services deploy.
  4. Define the service in the Terraform repo, deploy to a non-production environment, then shift traffic and disarm the deployment-group release pipeline.

Recommended actions

No specific actions for this repo. It either needs only normal maintenance, or its work is covered by an estate-level action. See the full programme.

Assessment notes

phenix-marketing-campaigns-api

Purpose

Marketing campaigns service: CRUD and workflow for campaigns, campaign types, templates (HtmlAgilityPack templating with tags), recipient lists and segmentation criteria, plus activity tracking. Includes a migration subsystem that bulk-imports legacy campaign/template/recipient data from Phenix SQL tables (MarketingCampaignType, MarketingTemplate, etc.) into MongoDB with migration-history tracking.

Tech stack

C# .NET 8 minimal-API style (endpoint extensions, Asp.Versioning), MediatR, FluentValidation with auto-validation, central package management (Directory.Packages.props), Swashbuckle, PhenixAuth JWT authentication scheme, TC.Diagnostics health checks, Scrutor, RestEase HTTP clients, global.json pinning SDK 8 with rollForward latestMajor.

Deployment

prod_application with 2 releases. One YAML build (phenix-marketing-campaigns-api, azure-pipelines.yml using shared InternalOSS templates v1.0, SDK 8.x) feeding release pipelines under \marketing\marketing-campaigns\ (master, release). New Relic app names configured per environment (eight appsettings variants including training/datafixqa).

Dependencies

Internal: TC.ConnectionBroker suite (Sql, Mongo, Redis, Api, Aws, Wcf) → tc-connectionbroker; TC.Exceptions → tc-exceptions; TC.Mail.Sender.Contracts → tc-mail-sender (email dispatch); TC.Phenix.Feature → phenix-feature-service; TC.Phenix.CompanyInfo → company-info-api; TC.UserAccount.ServiceClient → backoffice-useraccount-service; RestEase clients for the Contact API (phenix-contact-api, sales-person and marketing segmentation queries) and Web Details API (tc-web-details-api). External: AWS SQS transport for MassTransit, New Relic.

Data stores

Owns MongoDB database PhenixMarketing (via Mongo ConnectionBroker; embedded JSON seeding for segmentation criteria and template tags). Reads the shared Phenix SQL database through the SQL ConnectionBroker for one-way legacy data migration. Redis backs the Phenix user cache (TC.Cache RedisDual).

Integration points

Inbound REST with JWT auth. Outbound REST to contact and web-details APIs; publishes mail-send commands over MassTransit/AmazonSQS; Redis caching. A WCF ConnectionBroker is registered for the UserAccount service client.

Code health

Strong: five test projects (unit tests per layer plus integration tests, 65 test files) on xUnit v3 with NSubstitute/Shouldly; YAML CI runs all non-integration tests. Actively developed (last commit 2026-02-16). README is untouched boilerplate.

Modernisation risks

Low priority — modern .NET 8, good tests, YAML CI. Residual risks: the migration path keeps a read dependency on the shared Phenix SQL database (removable once migration completes), and the UserAccount WCF client is a legacy protocol edge. Otherwise a model citizen for the target architecture.